![]() ![]() It's not the one above linked but it's in good condition and should yield some interesting results. I'm not expected much since it was less than $50 but I'm still interested to see if this would be an answer to OP's original question. I just received a Helios 35mm f2.8 lens (M42 mount) and will try it out on the new Sony, once I get the body. The canon ltm 35/1.5 and olympus pen f 38/1.8 are great for swirls, but you can't really mount them on an canon dslr. Just sold my copy but the very early Takumar 35mm F2.3 can have swirly bokeh. Looks like it's made up from at least 2 different lenses, and the threads on the mount looks like they've been sheared off.Īre there really any answers to this question? I thought wider-than-50 lenses with the close focus distance and large apertures to really produce any kind of bokeh were fairly modern (as in post-swirly-bokeh) inventions? It's never been used because it's been in the mud puddle ![]() This makes it useful for a variety of photography styles including close-up, portrait, street or even landscape. As you can see from the video above, the 44-2 has different looks at depending on the relationship between the camera, subject and background. I love how that ad says, "looks like new, like it has never been used," and then you see the pictures and it looks like it has been stored in a mud puddle for about 10 years. The Helios 44-2 is a 58mm f/2 lens, which makes it a versatile piece of glass. Hope someone posts something, I'm curious what's out there for options. They have fantastic swirly bokeh and I was wondering if anybody can think of a wider angle lens in the 35mm or wider range to complete my "swirly bokeh" lens set.Īs long as I can adapt it to EF, I don't care what the original mount it. Looking for a swirly bokeh lens that's wider than the Helios 44-2 58mm f/2. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |